For "Gladiator II", the myth worth whispering about isn’t some idealistic political vision—it’s the unattainable legacy of its predecessor.
"Robin Hood" is solid craftsmanship; Ridley Scott doesn’t fall below the required level. However, it lacks the spark and epic quality.
Gladiator captivated the Romans, and Ridley Scott captivated moviegoers, turning on-screen death, shown brutally as never before into entertainment for millions
In November, Gladiator II premieres. Is it shaping up to be a big hit, or perhaps an even bigger flop? Let's talk about that.
I would be cautious in labeling "Gladiator" as flawless and completely fulfilled cinema.